Page 143 - 《社会》2023年第3期
P. 143

社会·2023·3

              unit”, and their respective behavioral logics are also different. The former suits for
              a rational bureaucracy, and its design of clear task boundaries causes the ambiguity
              of the responsibility boundaries of grassroots governments in practice, leaving
              institutional space for their risk avoidance strategies. The latter applies to the
              political integration, and its blurred task boundary design in fact forces grassroots
              governments to re鄄clarify their responsibility boundaries and enforce their sense of
              responsibility. Affected by the logic of the two systems, the responsibility boundary
              of  grassroots  governments  exhibits  the  characteristic  of  “fluidity”,  and
              governments’ behaviors have also shifted from “risk avoidance” to “risk taking”.
              Rational bureaucracy and political integration determine the dual role orientation of
             “business鄄politics” of grassroots governments, which in turn affects the fluidity of
              the responsibility boundary. Therefore, changes of events in the governance context
              become the trigger mechanism. In this case study, the incident was initially just a
              homestead dispute. However, according to the logic of rational bureaucracy, the
              local government avoided the responsibility to resolve the dispute by diverting the
              case to the Bureau of Justice and the Bureau of Health. When the petitioner’s
              appeal to the Bureaus failed, her journey of petitioning began. Since the incident
              has now transformed from an administrative incident to a petition case, the
              responsibility boundary of the local government has changed, and the political
              integration system began to play a major role. As a result, the local government
              takes on the responsibility of dealing with petition cases using tactics of
              appeasement, strict pressure, and downward responsibility transfer. This article
              constructed the phrase of “fluid responsibility boundary” and used it as an
              analytical framework, emphasizing the dual roles of grassroots governments and
              situational change in shaping their behavior. The study contributes to the dialogues
              and development of research on grassroots government responsibility.
              Keywords:boundary of responsibility of grassroots government,rational bureaucracy,
              political integration system, business departments, political units





               风险规避作为基层政府的重要行动特征之一, 在近年来受到学界
           的广泛关注(倪星、王锐,2017)。部分研究从为何规避风险的角度出发,
           指出“权责不等”是基层政府规避风险的主要原因(倪星、王锐,2018;李
           贺楼,2020;田先红,2021)。 另一些研究则揭示了基层政府规避风险的


           · 136·
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148