Page 119 - 《社会》2023年第3期

社会·2023·3

members， that is， through the “paternalistic” production arrangements of the
production team leader， tea production skills were disseminated to a wider range of
households. The positive impact of the collectivization system on the local tea
industry was the result of the interaction between the logic of state governance and
local traditions. As a part of the formal state power structure， the production team
leaders in the collectivization period were able to use the power endowed by the
state to transform the traditional way of family work， so that the corresponding
production arrangements were in line with the interests of the collective to the
greatest extent， and it ultimately enabled the smooth development of tea garden
production. However， although the family production organization was formally
abolished during the collectivization period， the logic of the family organization had
continued to a certain extent in the actual production organization. The production
team， especially the production team leaders’ balancing role between the“public
family” and the “small family” played the traditional role of family authority. The
study points out that it is these important features of collectivization period -the
“paternalistic” style leadership of the production team leaders and the household鄄
based production and marketing arrangements spreading production and marketing
skills to the majority of households in the community -that ultimately facilitated the
development of the family industry and the local tea economy in the post鄄
collectivization period.
Keywords：collectivization， production leader， household production， tea industry

一、 引言

学界对于国家宏观制度和意识形态的影响之研究存在一种较强的
去地方化和去历史性倾向（朱晓阳，2018；应星，2016），而从形式到实质
的社会学研究要求研究者采用更为经验的、 条件性的研究方式来追索
社会现象的作用机制和历史根源（肖瑛，2022）。 具体到对集体制之影响
的研究，需要改变以往将地方的文化传统、生计形态、地理环境等都视
为“自然背景”的做法，而将其视为社会文化的内在要素，考察其如何调
节集体化时期的制度效果（朱晓阳，2018）。
就集体制的具体实践与地方传统制度的勾连而言， 学者对家族组
织在集体化时期的继替关注甚多，尤其是在家族传统深厚的南方地区。

· 112·