Page 79 - 《社会》2020年第6期

社会·2020·6

the judgment of policy outcomes. How can we better understand the value ambiguities
behind the marriage and family law in China, the significant differences in position
between the state and the people, and the various dislocations between policy goals
and functions?
“Family policy” in this study is defined in a broad sense. The logic behind the
family policy phenomenon is explained accordingly through an analysis of the
institutional text and the policy supply mechanism. By distinguishing the parent蛳child
intergenerational relationship from the marriage relationship within the“family”， the
paper demonstrates that China’s family policy since the 1980s has dual principles for
the vertical intergenerational family and the horizontal marriage relationship. The
relevant laws have an institutional consistency in strengthening family responsibilities
and setting the family as an important welfare provider.
In addition, through the identification of the different attributes of laws and
regulations, and the analysis of the supply mechanism of the family policy in a broad
sense, the study suggests that local governments, responsible for family welfare, tend
to adopt private laws as the system framework and use“family蛳household” strategies
to improve family welfare provider capacities. Such strategies help reenforcing the
individual’s dependence on the family， especially the intergenerational family， but
at the same time may also bringing about certain policy outcomes that restrict family
life and family development.
Keywords：family policy，familization，principle，policy supply mechanism，family 蛳
household governance

1
在今年发布的《中华人民共和国民法典》 中，国家以既有的包括婚
姻法、继承法、收养法等在内的家事法律为基础，结合社会发展需要，正
式颁布了“婚姻家庭”编（民法典第五编）。 引人注目的是，关于协议离
2
婚，新法规加入了“三十日冷静期”的限制性条件。 !消息一经公开，立

1. 第十三届全国人民代表大会第三次会议于 2020 年 5 月 28 日表决通过 《中华人民共
和国民法典》，2021 年 1 月 1 日起实施。
2. 民法典第一千零七十七条规定，自婚姻登记机关收到离婚登记申请之日起三十日内，
任何一方不愿意离婚的， 可以向婚姻登记机关撤回离婚登记申请。 前款规定（转下页）

· 72 ·