Page 125 - 《党政研究》2024年么6期
P. 125

Characteristics of the Operational Mechanism and Construction of Oversight System for Government
             Algorithm                                                  CHU Er - Kang  MU Cong - Da  25


             〔 Abstract〕The Third Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee underscored the imperative to enhance
             a nationwide,integrated online government service platform,establishing new objectives and standards for the

             development of e - government. As digital governance advances within the framework of “ algorithmic administra
             tion”and the “ government algorithms”model,the challenges of effective “ algorithmic oversight”have become
             increasingly prominent. Addressing these challenges requires, first and foremost, a comprehensive understanding
             of the core operational characteristics of government algorithms. This includes the shift in “ management objects”

             from physical entities to data, in “ operational methods”from scenario - based applications to model - driven ap
             proaches,and in “ power structures”from regulatory norms to code - based frameworks. A thorough analysis of
             key theoretical aspects is essential, particularly regarding the “ alignment”between algorithmic oversight and reg
             ulatory structures,the “ interconnections”between algorithm design and implementation,and the “ integration”

             of algorithmic frameworks with underlying values. Building upon these foundational insights,it is crucial to es
             tablish a robust oversight framework encompassing preemptive oversight that emphasizes “ predictability,”mid -
             process oversight focused on “ compliance,”and post - process oversight centered on “ value orientation.”
             〔 Key words〕E - government,Algorithmic Administration,Government Algorithm,Oversight Mechanism





             Value Tension and Reconstruction:The Simplification and Trends of Administrative Procedures in
             Digital Government
                                                                                   GAO Ying  YE Mao  35


             〔 Abstract〕The administrative procedures within digital government are increasingly trending towards simplifica

             tion,thereby gradually shaping new dimensions of governance processes. This trend not only aligns with the
             principles of streamlined governance but also reflects multifaceted motivations aimed at enhancing administrative
             efficiency,safeguarding individual rights in administrative matters,and ensuring adherence to legal norms.
             Drawing on specific examples of automated administrative penalties and automated licensing processes, this study
             investigates the operational mechanisms and contextual applications that underpin the simplification of administra
             tive procedures in digital government. However, the convergence of these simplification trends with technological
             paradigms gives rise to systemic risks, primarily manifesting as challenges to traditional binary governance struc
             tures,an expansion of algorithmic administrative authority,potential restrictions on existing citizen rights,and
             value tensions that disrupt the balance between efficiency and equity. In light of these concerns, it is imperative
             to critically evaluate and reconstruct the simplification process for digital government administrative procedures by
             focusing on algorithmic procedural justice, establishing robust supervisory mechanisms for exercising power, and
             creating comprehensive bundles of digital rights. This approach seeks to simplify administrative procedures in a
             manner that is lawful, rational, and scientifically grounded while embodying a people - centered orientation with

             in the broader trend toward simplification.
             〔 Key words〕Automated Administration, Simplification of Administrative Procedures, Digital Rights, Procedur
             al Justice
                  2 ·  ·
                 1  4
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130